Ir para o conteúdo

As apostas esportivas em mercados de previsão foram consideradas “swaps”, isentas de leis estaduais

O tribunal decide que os EUA impedem os estados de aplicar leis de jogos de azar aos mercados de previsão.

schedule 21:56 visibility 6 visualizações
As apostas esportivas em mercados de previsão foram consideradas “swaps”, isentas de leis estaduais
Fonte: Ars Technica Ler artigo original →

auto_awesome Este artigo foi traduzido automaticamente e pode conter imprecisões.

A federal appeals court ruled that New Jersey cannot regulate sports bets on prediction markets because the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has exclusive jurisdiction.

Kalshi, which is registered with the CFTC as a designated contract market (DCM), last year won a preliminary injunction preventing the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement from enforcing a state law against its sports-related event contracts. The injunction issued by a district court was upheld today in a 2-1 decision by judges at the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit.

The CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction over DCMs under the Commodity Exchange Act, a US law. The question in the Kalshi lawsuit is whether the CFTC's exclusive jurisdiction "preempts New Jersey gambling laws and the state constitution’s prohibition on collegiate sports betting," the appeals court majority wrote. "New Jersey frames the issue broadly (regulating all sports gambling) rather than narrowly (regulating trading on federally designated contract markets)."

Read full article

Comments